Saturday, 19 January 2013

Increasing Rapes: India Humiliated


“Where women are honored, there the Gods are pleased.  But where they are not honored, no sacred rites yield rewards.”
Manu Smriti 3.56
In light of the above quoted statement from one of the oldest scriptures in India, one can easily deduce the reason behind the most troubles our Country is facing of late. Women belonging to a large section of the society are not safe in India. Crimes against women are on a rise. The best example as well as the most perturbing experience of harassment is faced by any woman during public transport. Crimes against women are not merely being committed in the remote areas or behind closed doors that one can not witness them; rather the crimes are now being committed in public sphere, and in presence of people, in the densely populated areas, where the perpetrators act as devils and the people as mute spectators.

We look at the increasing rape cases just as other crimes. It is getting very comfortable for us to read a couple of rape cases in the newspapers on a daily basis. It doesn't shock us anymore to read of minor girls being brutally raped. Are we turning into a society where compassion and empathy don't exist at all? Is the humanity shrinking within ourselves?

Rapes should not be seen as other crimes; for instance, theft. It is possible that a person may move ahead after an incident of theft. He may start earning more and possibly forget the incident eventually. But rape is not alike theft. A girl who is raped can not move ahead from that incident. It is not 'just' a crime against women. It is crushing the dignity, life and aspirations of a girl. The incident is imprinted on her mind for the rest of her life.  Physical pain may diminish with passage of time, but the mental pain, the stress, the agony, the helplessness, cumulatively bring her a feel of disgust that she can not forget for the rest of her life. The girl raped in Delhi on the 16th of December last year was a student of medicine and a doctor in the making. So, the rapists have not just raped her body, they have raped her aspiration of being a doctor and to serve the society. Had she been alive, I do not believe, she would have been able to go out and profess medicine. If a girl does not die after being raped, the life that awaits her is worse than death, where she has to forego all her aspirations, plannings and dreams for no fault of her and sit helplessly in a damp corner only hoping such incident had not happened.

It was almost unanimously felt that the victim in the recent Delhi rape was just unlucky to be there. It could have been anyone. People left hypocrisy and careless attitude behind after the recent incident. There was a huge outrage and public outcry in forms of candle marches and demonstrations all over India for stricter rape laws where the death penalty for rapists was foremost among other recommendations. But the outcry was too late. The girl still could not be saved. After a long brave battle, she succumbed to death. That made the prosecution case stronger, as the charges of homicide were added and the accused looked at death penalty for homicide if not for rape. Hence the purpose of the public outrage seemed to be served. But it can in truest sense be considered to be served, had this been the only rape incident to have occurred in our country. If not, there are thousands of other rapists who are still out there in public domain, living their lives as usual, after squelching the lives of thousands of innocent girls. Thousands of such incidents happen every year, and I vow not to go into such painful statistics and be pained further by analyzing such grossly insensate acts in terms of demographics and other negligible considerations.

Rape laws in India must change. The first change in rape law which is sought to be brought is enhancing punishment. Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code provides punishment for rape, where the maximum punishment is life imprisonment. The primary demand is to enhance the maximum punishment to death penalty. This change is most important and is imminently required. Most people and most political parties sans Congress would agree to it. But the change can not be limited to merely enhancing the punishment. The increase in punishment would be futile, if the conviction ratio stays dismally low. 

What needs to be done in the first place is to ensure that the person accused, if proved to have committed the crime, be convicted for the same. For this purpose, there must be relaxations in 'standard of proof'. Criminal law in India requires the prosecution to prove beyond all reasonable doubts that the accused had actually committed the felony alleged. I reckon there can be some relaxations in the standard of proof in such heinous crimes whilst ensuring that no innocent is punished. It must be the duty of the Courts to ensure that the perpetrators do not elude the process of law. 

The next reform that is required in the rape law is quick disposal of cases. There have been numerous cases where either the accused dies a natural death while awaiting a death sentence, or the poor victim does not survive to see the culprit being taken to gallows. In Indian law, the procedural laws as well as judicial hierarchy provide the criminals with a platform to live their lives in normal state until the case is finally decided. There are provisions conferring pardoning power on the State as well as Union Executive even after the Supreme Court finds the accused guilty. The law does not take its course. The fast track court was set up to dispose of the recent Delhi rape case. This is a positive step ahead and such courts must be set up in every state to ensure that such cases are quickly disposed of. 

Finally, it comes to punishment. Life imprisonment is certainly not sufficient for a person who has made a poor girl's life miserable by committing such a repelling act. The reformist theory can not be applied to such hardcore criminals who could ignore the weeping and screaming of the girl while committing the crime. Such criminals can not be sought to be reformed at the cost of life and dignity of other women. A deterrent approach is the way ahead looking at the increasing number of rape cases. Death penalty must be introduced for rapists at the earliest. Criminal jurisprudence in India advocates for death penalty only in the 'rarest of the rare' cases. Looking at the number of rapes, what case would be considered as 'rarest of rare'? Is it not rare enough that a man has committed such an insane and devilish act? Death penalty should be the law and not an exception for rapists.

Whether addressing the rapist as 'Bhaiya' would reduce such cases, or whether films and fashion have an influence over such rapists is not the debate we should be looking forward to. A rape is the most disgraceful and dastard act that a man commits and he must pay the price for the same. A clear message must be conveyed that the society doesn't need such people. Let us hope the Legislators play their part by introducing the reforms, the executive by bringing rapists before the Courts and finally the Judiciary by convicting them.

PS: I hope to live to see a day where our country is free from such rapists; where a girl can move freely without being under fear of any kind of violence. 

Jay Hind


Tuesday, 1 January 2013

The Rise And Rise Of Modi

Narendra Damodardas Modi. A name that is considered synonymous to win. A name that the 'neo-middle class' can relate to. A name that has created a cataclysm beneath 10, Janpath. He is not 'just' a politician, he is a phenomenon.

Gujarat elections were always in the limelight. Prime time news shows were all dedicated to Gujarat elections 2012. The reason was obviously the presence of Narendra Modi. But amusingly there were no debates if Modi would win it or not, it was just about the margin. That lays down for you, the stature that Narendra Modi has.

Modi became Gujarat's Chief Minister in 2001 for the first time owing to Keshubhai Patel's resignation for the party's loss in Gujarat by-elections. Gujarat didn't know what was coming its way. Seemed like Gujarat had hit its jackpot. The no nonsense raj had just begun.

A mob of people didn't know they were setting Gujarat on fire when they actually set ablaze Coach no. S-6 of the Ayodhya express carrying 58 pilgrims including 25 women and 15 children returning from Ayodhya on the 27th of February 2002. This incident enraged the people of the majority community and the retaliations led to riots. More than a 1,000 people belonging to both the clashing communities were killed, more than 70,000 fled their homes and almost everyone was in pains. There were pains of missing or losing someone they loved or knew, or at least the pain of seeing one's own State in such an ugly form.

It was not even one year of Modi's rule and the riots occurred. Modi's detractors portrayed him as the face behind riots for the reasons best known to them. Such portrayal raised serious doubts about the prospects of Gujarat post- 2002 elections. Modi had to prove his mettle this time and he did it all right. He won 127 seats in the 182 seat assembly; i.e. 10 more seats more than what Keshubhai had left for him. That should be suffice to show what people had understood of Modi, and the accusations on him.

Since 2002, Modi hasn't looked back. The people of Gujarat again voted for him in 2007. This time again he won a 122 seats. Sonia Gandhi came to Gujarat and dared to demean Modi as 'Maut Ke Saudagar'. Modi used it as his trump card, and how. Although, the chief agenda was of Gujarat development, but 'maut ke saudagar' and the Modi special responses to the Sonia comment caught more attention. He ensured an emphatic win for himself. Congress tried wooing voters by perennial attempts to malign Modi for 2002, but it all failed. 'Jeetega Gujarat' was ratified by the voters.

Post 2007, Modi became the face of development where Gujarat saw multi-nationals coming to Gujarat to invest, where the realty sector has been booming, the service sector doing the best it ever has. As they say, 'Self- proclamation is an art.' One person I know who is a master at this art is, undoubtedly Narendra Modi. He has proclaimed himself to be the man behind development, and has done it convincingly. Its not just about saying it, its about making others believe in it. People have believed in him. But alongside this self-proclamation, people have seen the success story of Gujarat being unveiled. In the able hands of Modi, Gujarat has become 'Vibrant'.

The 2012 elections were all about Modi and his political prospects. He was considered as a master strategist for BJP even before he became Gujarat's CM. His strategies were bound to be profitable. One year before Gujarat elections Modi initiated his 'Sadbhavna Yatra', to openly tell every person belonging to a nminority in any sense that Modi cares for them all. This was just to clear the air and rubbish the allegations on Modi having a sense of prejudice, specially for Muslims. For this yatra, he travelled to various districts of Gujarat. This was to ensure that the people of each district in Gujarat could relate to him and consider him one amongst them all and not as a CM who remains within the CM residence, deals with business tycoons and talks only to media.

The sadbhavna yatra laid the path for 2012 elections. The campaigning began, and so did the speculations. The mood was quite obvious. He had done pretty well in Gujarat in the last decade. Modi was seen as one of India's best CMs and prospective BJP's Prime Ministerial candidate for 2014 general elections. There was nothing against him. Some said that there was no Muslim candidate from BJP to which Modi assertively responded saying that 'I am your leader. You don't have to vote for the candidate. You have to vote for me. If you face any problems, directly come to me.' This underlines the prominence he has.

As against this, the Congress had gone from bad to worse since 2009 in the centre. In the state, they had no face to lead the election campaign. Shankarsinh Vaghela was borrowed from BJP. As most people said, Congress had a 'faceless and issueless' campaign. Nothing in their speeches would appeal to people. A congress leader called Modi a monkey and Manmohan Singh, a tiger and he knew he didn't have to wait for election results to tell his conscience who was who. National Congress leaders also came to Gujarat for campaigning. But it all seemed to be a formality that they were performing. Rahul Gandhi didn't dare to go to make one single speech at a BJP led constituency. They thought it was a smart move, as the statistics had not been in Rahul's favour. His success ratio in 2012 UP elections was hardly 11% in the constituencies where he campaigned. Seems he knew his presence is not going to affect the people and votes, at least the statistics would look better this way.

The voters turnout was immense. More than 70% voting in all over Gujarat. Keshubhai and his Parivartan Party were over optimist about the results. On the other side, Congress was hoping against hope that it does not lose in a worse way than the earlier losses.

20th December arrived and marked a phenomenal win for Narendra Modi. A 3rd consecutive election win. It was not just a win but a significant one. The people of Gujarat accentuated the Modi rule and ruled out the Congress even as an option. Winning a 115 seats out of 182 is no child's play. Alongwith Congress, Keshubhai and  hisparty were also whitewashed. Keshubhai was a CM in his own dreams that he saw, considering the patel community support. His dreams were shattered as his party won merely 2 seats. Modi also won for himself 12 out of 19 seats in Muslim dominated areas which clearly goes on to show Modi magic.

Modi has always been a prominent leader in BJP. With the 3rd consecutive win, he is seen as a Prime Ministerial candidate for BJP, not just by the media but even by the party faces. On the other hand, Rahul Gandhi is also speculated to be Congress face to counter Modi at centre. Thus far it's Modi 1- Rahul 0. 

The single party rule is not possible in current political scenario where the regional parties have command over general elections in their states. Modi is seen as a ruler and not a consensus builder and hence is undermined to be the Prime Minister. But this is a wrong perception that people have for him. Had he not been a consensus builder, the business lobby would not have considered Gujarat to be the best place for their investments. Modi is definitely a consensus builder, who can efficiently keep all the allies with him and run the nation, the way he has run Gujarat for over a decade. The nation awaits a change that Modi is.

Jai Hind